![12 vile vortices list 12 vile vortices list](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-C6ulcOtMLBE/XrGK86xo6rI/AAAAAAAAAEo/w52Gqc7hj-0sPOhuqSYGWdO9_22ntC-MwCLcBGAsYHQ/s640/triangle2.jpg)
Never heard of this, the name is nuts, is this just some wacky neologism cooked up by some minor nobodies, or do real people ever use the term? Might need to be deleted on notability concerns. DreamGuy 23:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC) Is this even notable? whomever made the article first or whichever better fits the article is used. Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.239.25 ( talk) 05:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC) "Civilisations" Ĭivilizations.
12 vile vortices list series#
Journeyman 03:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC) ĭoesn't it qualify as notable under the rubric of "modern mythology?" With the connection to the "Lost" series and all. 'Skeptics' better describes the position, as some academics may believe in VV's dismissing VV's is not inherent in being an academic - we just want rigourous proof.
![12 vile vortices list 12 vile vortices list](http://walkpowen.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/3/7/133761690/744632444_orig.png)
It's not great, but it's as good as there is on the net. Kiwipat 23:30, 16 April 2006 (UTC) I found one link, and put it in the article.
![12 vile vortices list 12 vile vortices list](https://img.youtube.com/vi/GKYNYcT-yd8/mqdefault.jpg)
Martial Law 05:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC) :) 1) I think changing the first sentence to something like "The Vile Vortices are twelve areas distributed more or less evenly around the globe that are alleged to have Bermuda Triangle-like qualities" should ease POV concerns 2) I don't think "noted" and "academics dismiss" are particularly weaselly - but if anyone can suggest any more neutral wording I'm all ears 3) If anyone who can find any online sources debunking the Vile Vortices by all means link them. Martial Law 05:08, 13 April 2006 (UTC) :) That is what I call skepticisim. I once had contact with a Ciscop man once, he "debunked" the fact that he was alive and a human being. Journeyman 06:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Try Ciscop, they "debunk" everything. I would like to see some links to people trying to debunk the concept. Sanderson." "As with the Bermuda Triangle _academics dismiss_ the Vile Vortices and any associated New Age or esoteric phenomena as pseudoscience."įurther, all the external links point to sites that support the existance of Vile Vortices. "was first advanced by _noted_ naturalist and author Ivan T. The article also contains many weasel words for example, From what I can gather, Vile Vortices are not proven to exist rather they are conjecture.
![12 vile vortices list 12 vile vortices list](https://walkpowen.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/3/7/133761690/pexels-photo-67448-cropped_1_orig.jpg)
This article IMHO is not written from a NPOV. Skepticism Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism Template:WikiProject Skepticism Skepticism articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. Paranormal Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal Template:WikiProject Paranormal paranormal articles If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions. This redirect falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. This redirect is of interest to the following WikiProjects: This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 20 June 2020.